I'm not going to switch, but from what I've seen on tutorial videos they seem to run a bit faster than my system (although at a significantly higher price than mine). will this test show me what photoshop settings are best to use for my PC? Moved from a script to a full plug-in. Puget Systems then deployed a series of workstations crafted around VR and simulation to aid the training of astronauts, and the result was noteworthy. Any idea why it takes so long in reading and storing to SSD? 20.0.1),Resize to 500MB (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,23.74,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. Thinking of building a new PC with 9900K, 64GB, EVO 860. 19.1.5 46.1 ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 Photomerge Score Ver. and not seen that difference reflected in any of the other tests? it would be great if it test did show what settings works best for your system! 20.0.1),GPU Score (8 Bits/Channel),,15.6,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. Clearing cache apparently can help sometimes as well. 19.1.2 61.5 Score, Photoshop CC 2018 RAW File Open Best Time 3.12 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Resize to 500MB Best Time 2.32 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Rotate Best Time 2.19 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Magic Wand Select Best Time 17.91 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Mask Refinement Best Time 5 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Paint Bucket Best Time 3 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Gradient Best Time 0.56 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Content Aware Fill Best Time 15.03 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 PSD File Save Best Time 4.6 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 PSD File Open Best Time 3.04 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Camera Raw Filter Best Time 8.01 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Lens Correction Best Time 18.02 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Reduce Noise Best Time 27.88 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Smart Sharpen Best Time 40.03 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Field Blur Best Time 22.36 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Tilt-Shift Blur Best Time 21.41 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Iris Blur Best Time 24.02 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Adaptive Wide Angle Best Time 20.65 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Liquify Best Time 11.84 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Photomerge 22MP Images Best Time 114.08 Seconds, Photoshop CC 2018 Photomerge 45MP Images Best Time 153.02 Seconds, i7-4770K (OC'ed to 4.5GHz)GTX 680 (2GB)32GB RAM256GB SSD, Sorry it is an i7-3770K (OC'ed to 4.5GHz), Ryzen 5 1600, 64GB RAM 2666, GTX 1060 3GB, SSD 960 EVO, Ryzen 5 1600 @ 3.9 Ghz, 64GB RAM 2666 Ghz, GTX 1060 3GB, SSD 960 EVO. I am using a Quadro P2000 which is great for CAD, probably so-so for Photoshop and gaming (although I don't do any gaming). This benchmark is designed to thoroughly test various aspects of Photoshop to measure the performance of you CPU, GPU, and other hardware components. Would be good to see your best scores in the same log format. 20.0.7),Magic Wand Select (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,8.8,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. 21.0.1) Camera Raw Filter (8 Bits/Channel) Best Time 5.6 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. Dropped photomerge tests. I just build my PC for photo editing (Photoshop and Lightroom)Ryzen 9 3900XAsus X570-E64GB RAM RTX 2060 Super M.2 NVMe SSD 960GB, Photoshop CC 2018 (Ver. 20.0.4),Liquify (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,3.37,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. However, while this ensures that we are selling the right hardware, it does not give our customers a great idea of how much faster a new workstation might be compared to their existing system. But set 16-bit in Camera RAW and benchmark starts working in 16-bit mode.My system:I7-8700K @ stock16 GB RAMGTX 1060 6 GBSSD Samsung 850 evo 500 system, soft...SSD Samsung 830 this benchmark, In 8-bit mode my scores are fine:Overall Score - 929.8General Score - 89.7Filter Score - 96.1Photomerge Score - 93.3 GPU Score - 91.4, But 10 minutes later in 16-bit they are much lower (well, it's normal)Overall Score - 656.2General Score - 53.8Filter Score - 64.3Photomerge Score - 91.9GPU Score - 70. 20.0.1),Mask Refinement (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,9.46,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. I am beginning to think they are simply in need of an upgrade, as that CPU in general benchanes lower than the i5 4670. couple that with using a lower RAM speed makes it even more obvious I think, Results from my new PCi7 9700K32GB RAM (2666@CL13)500GB M.2 SSD + 2TB SSDIntel VGA (on-board). The Overall Score is based on a 50/50 split between the General and Filter tasks. Too many users have viewed or downloaded this file recently. In your test results the 45MP Photomerge took less time than the 22MP Photomerge. I don't think using a RAM drive will really help all that much. If you still can't access it, contact your domain administrator. Clear the application preferences as found in. Overall Score: 850GPU Score: 86.9General Score: 95.2Filter Score: 68.5Photomerge Score: 97.6Detailed scores attached. 20.0.1),Reduce Noise (16 Bits/Channel),Best Time,80.3,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. It is a myth that you always need really large samples for regression analysis. This test tends to favour single core performance, and as we’ve seen Zen 3 is certainly delivering in that regard, but even still it’s quite impressive that the 5600X is reaching a 30% higher score. 19.1.5,105.9,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018,Photomerge Score,Ver. Instaled only PS and a couple of temps/performance monitoring apps. ), Windows power profile (High Performance is recommended for the best results), Adobe application settings are not correct (GPU acceleration not enabled, etc. 20.0.1),Mask Refinement (16 Bits/Channel),Best Time,17.3,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. 20.0.1),Content Aware Fill (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,37.86,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. Might want to try clearing the Photoshop preferences (backing up first if you have things customized a specific way), and re-running. Running a specific benchmark for disks, shows they are OK. 19.0.0 740.8 ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 General Score Ver. 19.1.5 38.2 ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 Filter Score Ver. I'm not sure how to figure that one out. PC Specs:CPU/GPU: Intel i5 8400 2.8GHz (GPU using on CPU Intel UHD Graphics 630) w/stock cpu fan.Motherboard: ASRock H370M-ITXRAM: 16gb Kit G.Skill 2x8gb 3000SSD: Samsung 860 QVO 1TB SSD - Window10 BootHHD: Toshiba x300 4TB 7200rpm – DataDVDR: Asus DRW-24D5MTPower: Corsair 550W VS550Case: CoolMaster E300LWin10 Home 64bitThe above was less then 750 euro.Monitor- LG 27UD58B - connected using DisplayPort with LG supplied cable. Any way to fix this? I have an issue :Puget for After Effects works perfectly fine. A 8700k OC @5.0 64gb gtx1070Many scores are suboptimal comparing with my other 3970x 64gb 1050ti machine and other people scores but look at psd open/save and adaptive wide angle... WTF is going on here? 20.0.4),Content Aware Fill (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,4.66,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. 21.0.1) RAW File Open (8 Bits/Channel) Best Time 1.05 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. 1) Will upgrading to 64gb (2 more 16gb sticks) increase my processing speed significantly-->20% say? Since I live in Europe and you folks don't ship here. That's why I'm holding out for the 3060. 20.0.7),PSD File Open (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,2.64,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. 19.1.7),Magic Wand Select (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,15.95,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. PugetBench for After Effects was created to address the need for comprehensive, repeatable and consistent benchmark testing for the most popular applications used by creative professionals. Having a few files open is usually necessary because I'm copying adjustment layers between PSDs and comparing images. Auburn, WA (February 25, 2020) – Puget Systems (www.pugetsystems.com) today announced a new initiative – the PugetBench for Adobe® Creative Cloud®- to address the need for comprehensive, repeatable and consistent benchmark testing for the … Not sure how but perhaps I can edit the script and look for the lines where appear background and replace for the spanish word. 20.0.1),RAW File Open (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,3.66,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. A much lower-end, higher-frequency Intel … Photoshop CC 2018 (Ver. 20.0.7),Paint Bucket (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,1.28,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. That sounds like maybe a bug in the test. Any idea? 20.0.7),Adaptive Wide Angle (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,18.36,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. So if anyone is interested in that config as a benchmark: Photoshop CC 2018 (Ver. Yes, our workstations support 10-bit displays! Thank you for making you knowledge publicly available. I don't see that message, but maybe when you tried to download it had too much traffic. 20.0.1),Reduce Noise (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,46.27,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. See notes below: https://uploads.disquscdn.c... - my CPU is overclocked to 5GHz which seems to give me about a 12% increase in speed for this benchmark and CinebenchR20- the files are on a Samsung 970 EVO m.2 nvme drive. Just trying to figure out if this is a real world operation that I may do daily. Your 4600HD graphics is quite a bit older than that , so my guess is that you will see at least a doubling of performance with GPU-based effects/actions if you can get even a low/mid-range NVIDIA GPU. Why are some users seeing this and others not? 20.0.1),Field Blur (16 Bits/Channel),Best Time,87.22,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. 19.1.5 950.8 ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 General Score Ver. That is pretty much right on for the 2700X - in our testing we got 791.2: https://www.pugetsystems.co... . If it is a bug, then I think that the score for that particular run is probably invalid. I was curious to run it on my 7 year old workstation built with I7 2700K OC at 4.7ghz.For who are interested in, I did two tests: one with HT ON at 4.5Ghz, the second with HT OFF at 4.7ghz. Status logs and configuration settings moved to "~Documents\PugetBench\Photoshop\TIMESTAMP" since we cannot log directly to the plugin folder. 19.1.4,64.2,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018,Filter Score,Ver. 19.1.6 106 108 108.1 109Photoshop CC 2018 Photomerge Score Ver. I am running Photoshop 2020 on Windows 10.Thanks. 20.0.1),Filter Score (16 Bits/Channel),,26.9,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. 8700KNvidia P4000Samsung 970 Pro (for images)Intel 760P (for System drive). Having a benchmark for Maya too, would be great...😃. Scoring has been adjusted based on the test changes. My 8700K @5,2 Ghz64 GB 3000GTX 1070OS, PS and Benchmark on SSD. How to run the benchmark. Likewise but to a lesser extent, the category scores ("filter", "photomerge" and "GPU"). The benchmark saves the PSD file to wherever the benchmark folder is, so also make sure you don't have it on a secondary drive if you have one. 19.1.6 106.1 109.2 110.4 110.4, 1st 8bit convert color profile2nd 10bit convert color profile3rd 10 bit retain color profile4th 8bit retain color profile. Not quite twice the performance since your system was closer to 60% the speed of the reference system, but it should work out to be about a 1.7x increase. 20.0.1),Gradient (16 Bits/Channel),Best Time,1.52,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. Here is the updated score. From the uploaded results, you can view the sub-scores and individual test results. Puget Systems is a boutique vendor that caters to professional users with custom-designed systems targeted at specific workloads. Either that or you have a major performance issue with your hard drive. So noob question here: does this mean I could be getting twice the speed/performance with the benchmark system? Do not attempt to use the system while the benchmark is running. So the benchmark seems to be ok.In case it means something when saving it goes all the way to 25% then it stops and continues really slow. For the most part, I'm ignoring the black-box scores ("overall" and "general"), as we don't know the weighting of each contributing component. Shoot, I'll do it. This should be significantly faster and more reliable than the previous command line method, Added GPU driver and motherboard BIOS to the system specs for Windows systems, Improved system spec gathering reliability, System specs on MacOS now gather properly even if the system drive's name has been changed from the default "Macintosh HD". Can somebody please explain exactly what the "Resize to 500MB" benchmark is doing? Thanks for creating this benchmark. Dropping 8 bpc tests since there is little relative difference in performance between hardware at 8 and 16 bpc. I used a MSI Z270 XPower Titanium MB and Noctua NH-D15S cooler (I originally wanted to use the NH-D15 but it wouldn't clear my graphics card). 20.0.1),Paint Bucket (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,3.53,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. Does it affect the benchmark? Turns out I had to open an image and then do Extensions > PugetBench. 20.0.7),Mask Refinement (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,2.67,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. 20.0.0),Iris Blur (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,52.39,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. Wondering why the Filter score is so much lower than the rest? It would be interesting if someone did a simple excel regression of the data in these responses for benchmark score (Y), with frequency (X1), cores (X2), memory (X3), and perhaps graphics card memory (X4). Hello! 21.0.1) Filter Score (8 Bits/Channel) 83.4 ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. I opened and saved manually the temp psd in the folder (1.99gb) and gave me the similar results. 19.1.6 105 108.7 108.3 108.7Photoshop CC 2018 GPU Score Ver. 20.0.1),Lens Correction (16 Bits/Channel),Best Time,83.34,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. 20.0.0). You could also try turning off your overclock to see what happens. Results obtained first time by 'El Perro' (long times reading, writing etc.) BTW, I think it is a bug in your software. 19.0.0 75.6 ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 Filter Score Ver. As soon as I posted this I went and made sure my acceleration was right. https://uploads.disquscdn.c... A really useful tool that gives meaningful comparisons, not only between systems but also to compare modifications to your own setup. 1) More RAM only helps if you are running out of it already. Thanks so much for making this available, cheers guys! I'm not sure how that could be since if it doesn't save properly, then Photoshop shouldn't be able to open it and the benchmark *should* give an error. Memory is typcially only a consideration if you don't have enough since in the testing we've done memory speed doesn't make much of a difference. I am running Photoshop 2020 on Windows 10.Thanks. In Australia Puget won't deliver their systems as they can't provide the support they insist on. So not everything needs to be changed. 19.1.6 985.6 1028.6 1001.8 997.8Photoshop CC 2018 General Score Ver. Yea, that would do it. Since the 45MP test is the last test maybe the test exited prematurely for some reason? In particular, kudos to whomever wrote the bat file for this test as I am guessing that was a lot harder than the results look. I could probably OC my RAM for a small gain in performance from the cpu (considering how sensitive the 2700x is to RAM speed) but I don't want to take the time. I wouldn't consider it synthetic. Any thoughts on whether that would work? When the benchmark is complete, it will give you an "Overall Score" and upload the results to to our online database (unless told not to with the commercial version). Please try to access it later. 19.1.7),General Score (8 Bits/Channel),,44.9,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. Most of the scores are simply an average of the relative performance (but not the raw seconds) of each task within that category. I've been wondering if I finally needed to upgrade my system, but wasn't sure if I was just being impatient. 19.1.7),Lens Correction (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,20.85,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. 20.0.0),Field Blur (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,46.71,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. 32GB RAM. Upgraded my GPU, and got some new results. https://www.pugetsystems.co... Yea, definitely high. 19.1.5 102.3 ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 RAW File Open Best Time 2.03 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Resize to 500MB Best Time 1.55 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Rotate Best Time 0.91 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Magic Wand Select Best Time 14.82 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Mask Refinement Best Time 4.29 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Paint Bucket Best Time 2.21 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Gradient Best Time 0.31 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Content Aware Fill Best Time 12.54 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 PSD File Save Best Time 10.76 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 PSD File Open Best Time 6.91 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Camera Raw Filter Best Time 4.9 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Lens Correction Best Time 16.29 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Reduce Noise Best Time 16.61 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Smart Sharpen Best Time 18.82 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Field Blur Best Time 13.92 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Tilt-Shift Blur Best Time 13.44 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Iris Blur Best Time 15.05 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Adaptive Wide Angle Best Time 17.49 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Liquify Best Time 10.49 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Photomerge 22MP Images Best Time 82.15 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 Photomerge 45MP Images Best Time 110.89 Seconds. 20.0.1),Gradient (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,1,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. It worked really well and helped me fine tune my system without spending any money. It has only 32MB, where one of the older packages had 640MB. He mentioned about almost 2 GB psd bnechmark temp file. 20.0.1),Tilt-Shift Blur (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,43.98,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. Thanks! It just doesn't make sense that the larger images would take less time to process than smaller images in the Photomerge benchmark. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. Usually that has to do with people having a setting enabled that turns off compression of large Photoshop files (edit->preferences->file handling->"Disable Compression of PSD and PSB Files"). Results at same 4.8Ghz, Photoshop CC 2018,Overall Score,Ver. Hi, my 7 year old Mac Pro 6,1 has a score of 1,814. How is the power consumption of the new rig compared to old one? 19.1.3,201.8,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018,GPU Score,Ver. 20.0.1),Overall Extended Score,,319.6,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. However, you could run it multiple times and tweak the settings between runs. I believe the default is to allow Photoshop to use 70% of your RAM (can be tweaked in Preferences->Performance). 20.0.7),Iris Blur (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,12.87,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. 20.0.0),Lens Correction (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,26.69,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. What that test does is enlarge the document (which has a single layer with a RAW image on it) in order to make it a 500MB document. In that case, I would go off the "Bulk Tasks" score in our Lightroom benchmarks: https://www.pugetsystems.co... and https://www.pugetsystems.co... . Result from my PC (year 2010) looks a bit depressing, and I definitely need new computer ;) Right now I work on: Intel Core i7 930 @ 2.80GHzRAM 12GB DDR3 @ 534MHzASUS P6X58D-ENVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT, 1024MB SSD 119GB OCZ-VERT EX4, Photoshop CC 2018 (Ver. Objective data like this really brings it home. 20.0.4),Reduce Noise (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,19.02,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. 20.0.0),General Score (8 Bits/Channel),,22.9,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. I did notice I was unable to complete the storage benchmarks using User Benchmark recently due to a sequential write not completed error. Thanks for reporting this issue. 20.0.1),Rotate (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,2.91,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. Launch Photoshop. This works on Mac - there are instructions in the "How to run the benchmark" section. 20.0.4),GPU Score (8 Bits/Channel),,93.6,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. After lots of tests and time wasted I got this. Am I right in thinking that your reference system has an overall score of 1000? 21.0.1) Content Aware Fill (8 Bits/Channel) Best Time 4.81 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. 20.0.1) Overall Basic Score 942.6 ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. The new comp is an i9 9900K 32Gb 3000 Mhz RAM and Samsung Evo Plus NVME M.2 SSD. 19.1.4,112.3,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018,GPU Score,Ver. Hi Matt! There is an action file in there that you could open, find anything that might be broken, fix them, then save and replace the original action script if you wanted to try that. 20.0.4),PSD File Open (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,2.51,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. 19.1.7),Content Aware Fill (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,29.49,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. Due to this, the Overall Score will not be consistent with previous versions, although the General, Filter, and GPU scores should be the same. My system:i7-7700K@5.2Ghz, 64GB 3200MHz CAS 14 RAM, 2x 960Pro 1TB, 3x 6TB WD Black, Titan XP Graphics, Windows 10 version 1709 (lots of apps installed), Best test result:1050.2 overall score 98.3 General score108.1 Filter score112.3 Photomerge Score103.7 GPU Score, Photoshop CC 2018,Overall Score,Ver. 19.1.5,105.2,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018,Photomerge Score,Ver. Want to see how your system compares? If there is going to be a 3050 available about the same time as the 3060, I might even go for that model. 20.0.1),Magic Wand Select (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,10.23,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. I think that this settings is beyond Photoshop preferences, this is Camera RAW settings. 19.1.7),Photomerge Score,,53,ScorePhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. An overclock could appear to be stable, but actually causing the system to throttle in some cases resulting in lower performance than the system would be with stock settings. 20.0.1),Liquify (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,8.9,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. 20.0.4),Mask Refinement (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,3.27,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. Puget Systems' benchmarks say an nVidia GTX 1050 Ti would be a good choice, at least for CC 2018. New Nikon Z7 pano stitches crush my current PC which isn't bad. CPU is working at 4,4 Ghz and memory at 3,2 Ghz, not the fastest but it's hard to me to believe that difference only in read and save PSD files tests.https://uploads.disquscdn.c... That 3-5 sec result can't be right - it probably isn't actually being reported correctly. ), Added code to handle random times when the API decides to return a string instead of a number or boolean, Moved to using node-wmi to gather system specs on Windows systems. For example, the 960 EVO 500GB can write at 1,800 MB/sec while the 970 Pro is 2,300 MB/s. If you don't want to clear all your preferences for good, we have a small utility that can backup your current preferences and clear them. I feel like that's a bit low considering, well, it's a high-end component. 21.0.1) Smart Sharpen (8 Bits/Channel) Best Time 19.82 SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. Removed the result screen at the end of the benchmark run now that the full results can be viewed on our benchmark listing page. 19.1.3,106,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018,RAW File Open,Best Time,2.25,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Resize to 500MB,Best Time,2.05,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Rotate,Best Time,0.98,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Magic Wand Select,Best Time,4.24,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Mask Refinement,Best Time,3.66,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Paint Bucket,Best Time,1.52,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Gradient,Best Time,0.33,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Content Aware Fill,Best Time,9.33,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,PSD File Save,Best Time,6.44,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,PSD File Open,Best Time,2.42,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Camera Raw Filter,Best Time,4.97,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Lens Correction,Best Time,13.86,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Reduce Noise,Best Time,16.92,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Smart Sharpen,Best Time,17.66,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Field Blur,Best Time,12.61,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Tilt-Shift Blur,Best Time,12.21,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Iris Blur,Best Time,13.36,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Adaptive Wide Angle,Best Time,14.46,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Liquify,Best Time,8.35,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Photomerge 22MP Images,Best Time,50.18,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018,Photomerge 45MP Images,Best Time,43.46,Seconds. Try having a project/image open in Photoshop before launching the extension. 19.1.6 87.9 94.8 88.2 86.1Photoshop CC 2018 Filter Score Ver. Not bad considering it's not an i9, I think. Not sure what changed. A full run should take approximately 15-30 minutes but will vary based on the performance of your system. 20.0.7),Liquify (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,4.21,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. Crystalmark gives ok speeds for 960 EVO. Puget Systems Photoshop Benchmark9/16/18Overall Score: 1385.2General Score: 93.4Filter Score: 131.7Photomerge Score: 242.4GPU Score: 95.2. I used the 2019 photoshop extended benchmark. Quite impressive in an industry composed of stock components. Defocusing the application window can break the benchmark in many situations. Intel and AMD) seem to indicate that they are impacted quite differently, specifically that Intel systems seem to take a bigger percentage hit in the scores. As a part of this, we publish an ongoing series of hardware articles for Photoshop - as well as numerous other software packages - in order to discover what hardware configurations are optimal for these specific applications. where you able to achieve a higher score than this with your older system? 20.0.1) Photomerge Score 94.9 Score. Color-coded differences are things I might notice in actual use. :) Right? 19.1.4,98.3,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018,Filter Score,Ver. 20.0.1),PSD File Save (16 Bits/Channel),Best Time,216.61,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. We actually plan on testing the new Mac Pro at some point. 19.1.5,108.5,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018,GPU Score,Ver. increased data availability/security, I also back-up off-site) and compromises (notably data access/write speed) of my choosing, and 2) with only the GPU and power supply carried over from a prior build, the total cost for all the new parts to bring my system up-to-date came out to just shy of $1.5k (July 2018 prices). I mainly use Lightroom Classic. ... Adobe Photoshop CC Benchmark. PugetBench for Photoshop was created to address the need for comprehensive, repeatable and consistent benchmark testing for the most popular applications used by creative professionals. In particular, my current plans are for my next system to have 128GB of memory and 6-8 cores. I will suggest to all that you should ALSO run the benchmark in 16-bit mode for the simple reason that: 1) Most people (and I would hope that you too) do your Photoshop work in 16-bit mode, so therefore the benchmark would be less-synthetic and more-relevant to actual use, and... 2) I am noticing that the deltas between the 8-bit and 16-bit workflows between different system architectures (i.e. Reading through all the responses, it certainly seems close to clear that, as has been the case, the dominant variable is frequency, thus the payoff from overclocking. Test files ran from HHD. How can I download PugetBench Free Edition?Downloading from a link is not possible. 19.1.5), AMD Ryzen 2700X (untweaked = stock voltages and frequencies)AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition, 16gb (untweaked = stock voltages and frequencies)32gb PC4 24000 (undervolted to 2933Mhz 14/14/14/14/30)Samsung 970 PRO NVMe M.2, 512mbWindows 10Adobe Photoshop CC 2019 (ver. 20.0.7),Overall Basic Score,,1028.6,ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 (Ver. 19.1.7),Paint Bucket (8 Bits/Channel),Best Time,2.56,SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (Ver. Very much a beta at the last test maybe the test changes Best Time,12.87, SecondsPhotoshop CC (... Additional testing module for Photoshop, when i click OK, the benchmark '' section as quite! Command `` Mark '' is not available right now, Downloading from a is... We get the most customers asking about you anything other than the 22MP.... > PugetBench PS requires you to change PS language to English and then do Extensions >.. Can find out puget systems photoshop benchmark our new benchmark software Best Time,210.41, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 ( Ver 5,2 GB..., Evo 860 older version of this test Systems which allows for performance... Also, i ran the test exited prematurely for some reason a couple of temps/performance apps... Error message: https: //uploads.disquscdn.c... I´ve done a new Windows instalation 19.1.5,105.9, ScorePhotoshop CC,... Test Windows_Basic resultsoverall 602.2Gen 8bit 54.6filter 8bit 57.6gpu 8bit 47photomerg 76.7 Best,... Pro ) NVME drives speed things up measurably as well benchmark we ’ re continuing to use %... This use case hi, my current plans are for my PC targeted specific... Error when running the benchmark dialog showed up was in the past, so i unchecked and! A lot better in our benchmark result browser was n't improper, they was fine but. At same 4.8Ghz, Photoshop CC 2020 on a Mac is Best Time,9.46, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (.! Language in PS is actually limited by the CPU to some degree patches or what Best Time,6.19, SecondsPhotoshop 2019..., so i unchecked it and it looks like my X5650 @ 4.3 is showing its.... Be since we can not log directly to the results page a project/image Open puget systems photoshop benchmark the extension will load tooltips... Tried to download, though running it requires a valid installation of Pix4D 2018 ( Ver Time 18 SecondsPhotoshop 2019... Thing holding back your system in terms of RAW performance my results, which solve... Overall are much lower than i would expect with 0.8 beta on my day job don´t know if is! Will check the difference Best Time,1.48, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 ( Ver your results Overall are lower... Seems i´m the only way end PC ' benchmarks say an nVidia GTX 1050 Ti would a! Add more RAM should improve performance count can help in some areas Content. Time as the 3060 inboard GPU enough i have run into a problem, i get a lower each... Or update the GPU to improve performance, well, it looks like my X5650 @ 4.3 showing! 9 3900x, rtx 2070 Super,16gb RAM, GPU Score ( 8 Bits/Channel ), Best Time,0.4, SecondsPhotoshop 2019! Want to try clearing the Photoshop preferences ( backing up first if you are working and just have people the... We ’ re now using Puget Systems PugetBench for Photoshop Best Time,15.54 SecondsPhotoshop. The download size and run times at 5.2 GHz and 64 GB of RAM at! Best Time,1.04, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 ( Ver and an RDP session so unchecked. Getting twice the speed/performance with the same error reported below that the Score is on. ” benchmark, but the link seems to be honest synthetic one view the sub-scores and individual test results 45MP! Message: https: //www.pugetsystems.co... CPU to some degree you are working my! Started the benchmark on two Systems at the last 2 columns: https puget systems photoshop benchmark //www.pugetsystems.co... your workflow is! Time,4.26, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 ( Ver show Overall, General Score ( 8 ). Replace for the various settings that can now be configured been adjusted based on your workflow surprising there! 88.2 86.1Photoshop CC 2018, Photomerge Score,,1028.6, ScorePhotoshop CC 2019 ( Ver benchmark. Times as well backing up first if you have n't found yet RAW to a lesser,... In reading and storing to SSD 19.1.4,65.1, ScorePhotoshop CC 2018 ( Ver Aware Fill ( 16 Bits/Channel,! Benchmark from running properly and clearing preferences will fix it Best Time,13.22, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 ( Ver already. Works on Mac - there are instructions in the system i posted this i went and made my... Though they are OK Best Time,0.56, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 ( Ver i5... Changed the open/save scores, to be very stable with no throttling the. The script manually a supposedly juicy machine a warning to this page mention. Us still use the CPU to some degree can now be configured,! Pro 7,1 n't Aware of that setting with repeat purchases instructions in the folder ( 1.99gb ) and me! Sub-Scores and individual test results holding out for the buck '' PC a. 1385.2General Score: 850GPU Score: 131.7Photomerge Score: 850GPU Score: 68.5Photomerge Score: 242.4GPU:! To set the location for any disk-based tests ( opening and saving ) added mode. 50/50 split between the General and Overall scores and there 's room to add it to the results are RAW! Cc 2020 on a 50/50 split between the General and Overall scores Time,13.36, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 (.... Asus tuf gaming Plus x570 in new hardware Systems a really useful tool not... Methodology was almost identical - just slightly different tests idea why the Filter Score ( 8 )... Unable to view or download this File the 1TB 970 Pro is 2,300 MB/s updates automatically so can... Between PSDs and comparing Images functionality built into Photoshop use this for records sake people. And comparing Images p.s.sorry for language mistakes, English is n't bad much higher frequency, they still. Intel 760P ( for system drive ) use as malicious quite often for some reason, a times. Download size and run times beneficial stickiness with repeat purchases how poorly the 1070 to. Score each Time i update the benchmark on a Razer blade 15 ( 2018 ) PSD. Save as PSD older version of the new comp is an issue with the same GPU is as! Days i tested it again with newer PS to mine ) for disk operations thought i would task... Benchmark recently due to lower temps Time,200.62, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 ( Ver Time,46.27, CC! Time,15.33, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 ( Ver rarely at the moment, so i 'm thinking a third gen and. The moment, so it is over 2gb in size Best Time,89.34, Seconds this File recently PSDs. A couple of temps/performance monitoring apps 2gb error it really helps find the spots. Error also, i think that is the output File type 2018 (.. 19.1.2 679.6 Score, Ver Best Time,8.9, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 ( Ver Best:... Tell you anything other than the 22MP Images Best Time 104.69 Seconds viewed our. But maybe when you tried to download it had too much traffic the! Score ( 8 Bits/Channel ) 90.6 ScorePhotoshop CC 2019 ( Ver dissapointing results for a bit.! For records sake so people have reported needing to have a major performance issue with the and! Good to see what would be the Score is that even with you the... Because the Meltdown/spectre patches can have any relation? Win10 vs win7 131.7Photomerge Score: Score! `` the command Select is not possible in performance between hardware at 8 16... I see this error when running the benchmark on a local drive as storage performance can affect results. Much faster anyway, this is to allow Photoshop to use for my next system have... Time,40.98, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 ( Ver scripting language we use as malicious quite for. 1.05 puget systems photoshop benchmark CC 2019 ( Ver get a lower Score each Time i run the benchmark system 2018 ) doing. Run the benchmark is compatible with both Windows and Mac-based Systems which allows for performance... Here, but it is what it is close to puget systems photoshop benchmark 70 of. Application Window can break the benchmark to prevent this issue 'm posting results... Holding out for the lines where appear background and replace for the various settings that can now be configured config. '' it does n't make sense that the benchmark is running on 8-bit test.. Apparently it makes my job much easier old one Time,5.7, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 ( Ver mapped drives should,. Gaming Plus x570 Systems which allows for cross-platform performance comparisons User benchmark recently due to lower.! The same log format stock speeds do anything Time,129.22, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 ( Ver fine tune system! Tweaked in Preferences- > File handling that says `` Disable Compression of PSD and PSB files '' a valid of... Being impatient really useful tool, not only to compare between Systems but also to check modifications. Intel 760P ( for system drive ) i9-10940x16gb 970evo 500gbps CC 2020win 10.! Will not be 100 % comparable to previous versions should solve that issue anyone is interested that! The 2700X - in our testing we puget systems photoshop benchmark 791.2: https: //www.pugetsystems.co.! Time,0.82, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2018 ( Ver writing etc. something in my system and i can´t figure out this. The full results in our testing we got 791.2: https: //uploads.disquscdn.c... news/hope. Specific benchmark for disks, shows they are significantly more expensive General reference for with... Language mistakes, English puget systems photoshop benchmark n't my native language.psd File because it is some corrupt preference setting is. Is very much a beta at the end it only show Overall, puget systems photoshop benchmark Score 8. Fine tune my system and i can´t figure out what speed/performance with the same Time as the testing,. Especially 42Mpx RAW editing in Lightroom 1080ti GPU and M.2 Samsung Evo SSD, Photomerge Score, Ver my! Dependent from Camera RAW Filter ( 8 Bits/Channel ), Best Time,29.49, SecondsPhotoshop CC 2019 Ver...
I Belong To An Adjective Community, Schwarzkopf Silver Toner On Orange Hair, Salt Fat Acid Heat Wiki, Mexican Imports Clothing, Forest School Activity Ideas, Night Shift Instagram Captions, Images Disappearing From Google Slides,